at frieze, it’s hip to be square

the anish kapor@ lisson + your resident blogger + a whoooole lotta strangers

This weekend I hopped on the Eurostar to London for Frieze Art Fair. Frieze features the crème de la crème of the gallery world, while offshoot fairs like Moniker and Sunday offer alternative, more affordable pieces by lesser known artists. Though much of what was shown at Frieze wasn’t exactly revelatory per se, it was still and unsurprisingly a Pretty Good Show. Unfortunately Moniker and Sunday Art Fair were severely underwhelming, which was disappointing as it left little purchasing room for the neophyte collector. (I did really like the space @ Ambika for Sunday, though.) Multiplied Art Fair, Christie’s fair in South Kensington, was supposedly a good one for the mid-range collector, but unfortunately I missed that one.

The big hype @ Frieze came from Foundation projects like Pierre Huyghe’s hermit-crab-homage to Brancusi and Christian Jankowski’s yacht, which, depending on who you asked were either silly or stellar. (I will admit that I was pretty skeptical about the hermit crab, especially after it was turned back at customs, but in the end I surprised myself by hanging around to watch that little crab do his thing.) LuckyPDF‘s project space was the most interactive of the bunch, with the young crew filming live and hosting open rehearsals all day. Their space drew a younger, dare I say hipper, crowd than those milling about the aforementioned yacht and/or hermit crab.

Aside from those project spaces, there was FRAME, a section dedicated to younger, emerging galleries, Frieze Talks by artists, curators, and the like, and of course the seemingly endless rows of the gallery world’s latest and greatest hits. This is where the average fair-goer becomes overwhelmed trying to 1. see everything, and 2. process everything he or she has just seen. The spectator’s experience is akin to watching a continuous photomontage of a wide variety of images; it is visually stimulating but hard to keep track of, and many young and new collectors in the end quickly forget what they liked or why. (This I think is a big mistake many aspiring collectors make; ie checking off every single work of art to ensure they’ve covered their ground before purchasing. It is an impossible and fruitless task, and better to just go with your gut, if you ask me.)

I knew I couldn’t possibly see everything in every stand (and à vrai dire did not want to), so besides checking out the must-see heavy-hitters of the gallery world, I only stopped when something really caught my eye. Off the bat I noticed what seemed to be an underlying theme amongst a number of stands, many of which featured geometrically-inspired work. This suited me, as I am often drawn to linear, colorful, geometric works (perso, I tend to prefer those on paper, in case you are looking to gift me). More precisely, squares made it into the spotlight, often superimposed on different media as a kind of cheeky throwback to modernist tropes of the flatness of the picture plane and the limitations of the canvas. This being 2011, these ideas had to be updated beyond paint on canvas alone.

Paul Chan’s Volumes at the Greene Naftali stand, for instance, featured 28 book covers, each home to a seemingly sporadic arrangement of painted squares, mounted on one wall of the stand and creating a striking visual display.

Unfortunately, the stand was packed when I shot this, so the work’s impact doesn’t quite translate here, but it was one worth stopping in front of. (If I had a nickel for every time someone stepped in front of me to take a photo…)

Next I spotted a series of Moyra Daveys at Greengrassi’s stand, and again a few aisles over in Murray Guy’s stand for c-prints and postage from Davey’s 2011 Trust Me.

       

MD@greengrassi

MD@murrayguy

I quite like these stamp and postage-peppered pieces, and especially the odd and nearly pixelated effect the bits of green tape give from afar.

Squares played a part also in Marine Hugonnier’s Art For Modern Architecture Glr Guardian Iranian Revolution/Hostage Crisis, at Max Wigram. Taking a series of 1970s/80s articles from the Guardian, Hugonnier uses decorative neons and square and rectangle shapes to redact sections of each story. The result is a colorful and clever censorship and was one of the few works on display at Frieze that came close to anything like political commentary (a rarity this year).

        

Luiz Zerbini’s aluminium and acrylic Typo (below), also at Max Wigram, took a decidely more neutral approach.

Me, I happen to like the sharp edges of a square (Joseph Albers, anyone?) and find them generally visually appealing. (Circles, not so much.)  But I’ll be curious to see if the square resurfaces as often at FIAC this week in Paris. Other than squares, neon lights and colors also made frequent appearances @ Frieze, though video art was conspicuously absent, aside from a few pieces. My hunch is there will be more video in Paris than London, but tune in this weekend post another round of fair-hopping for more on that matter.

 

About these ads

One thought on “at frieze, it’s hip to be square

  1. Pingback: Armory Arts Week, NYC | a visual diary of the delicious and dashing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s